Open Question

Supporters argue that allowing assisted dying for those with non-terminal conditions recognizes individual autonomy and respects a person’s right to escape intense suffering. They believe current safeguards, such as independent medical evaluations, ensure people can freely make this choice after exploring all care options. In their view, patients should not be forced to endure debilitating pain simply because their condition is not formally “terminal.” Opponents worry that such liberal laws diminish the value of life and may pressure disabled or chronically ill individuals to view death as a readily available option. They contend that allowing assisted dying for non-terminal patients fails to address wider inequalities in healthcare, community support, and mental health services. Ultimately, the debate raises questions about personal freedom and societal responsibility.

assisted-dying, suffering, legislation, disability